The Truth Behind 9/11? - Understanding Eli

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

The Truth Behind 9/11?

The truth behind 9/11 has plagued me for a couple of months now, pretty much ever since a friend of mine turned me onto a video entitled "Loose Change". It's video that opens up a lot of unanswered questions and has a deep insight into the physical impossibility of what 'they' say happened on that fateful day.

After about a month of deep research into the day, hundreds of videos watched and an equal amount of articles (on both sides of the argument) I kinda fell away from the debate because I felt helpless. I mean, what the hell can I do? Nothing really... except talk about it.

"United 93", the recently released movie, was what brought me back. Why? Because it stirred up all that frustration I felt a few months ago. The very fact this this movie has been made and released is questionable enough to delve a little deeper into the happenings of that day. It's easy to see that this movie is nothing more than propaganda to help keep people fearing the 'terrorists'. Furthermore, the fact that people are making money off of this event, sickens me.

Since Thursday of last week, I've been on and endless quest for information regarding this day. I've developed a thirst for it and one that is unquenchable and again, my frustration level has risen to a degree that I probably haven't felt before. Why? Again, there is nothing I can do about it besides talk and hopefully turn a few people onto the questions so that they start asking questions themselves.

My questions

1) The World Trade Center:

How the hell did the WTC's fall by just planes hitting them? How did they fall (in a near free fall) just by having a fire close to the top of the building? Why did building 7 fall when no plane hit it and only minor fires were inside? Why did that one fall in a free fall? Why did all these building's look as if they were purposely brought down by a demo team? Why do we, in some of the footage taken that day, hear explosions going off just before (and during) they building's collapse?

2) The Pentagon attack:

Why do the damage caused by the plane not match the damage that would be caused by a 757 (after all, we're supposed to believe the same sized plane took down the WTC's)? Why is there no wreckage of this multi ton monster? Why no engines? Why no wings or tail end? Why no seats or luggage? Where are the bodies? Where is the blood? How did a huge 757 pull off the maneuvers it did before hitting the pentagon? How did a human being fly such a huge plane so close to the ground? Why was there a huge box covered in tarp removed from the scene before an investigation could take place? Why was there a line of people picking up small piece of the wreckage before an investigation could be made? Why has only 5 frames of footage released (after they lied and saying no video footage was available) from nearby cameras who caught everything? Why were the 4 videos from nearby businesses confiscated by the FBI minutes after the crash? Why are these videos yet to be released?

3) Flight 93:

Where is the plane? Where is the wreckage? Where are the seats, the luggage, the bodies, the blood? Why was there just a crater in the ground and nothing else? Where was the smoke that would be caused by such a huge crash a few minutes after it supposedly happened? Why do the pictures of this 'crash' not match the pictures of any other plane crash in our history of flight?

4) US Military action:

Where were the fighter jets? Why were they so late in showing up on the scene when there are bases a few miles away from the WTC's? Why were these planes allowed to go so far off course and not intercepted? Why was the military able to intercept %100 of the planes that went off course previously to this day and not the 4 that were 'hijacked' on Sept 11th? How could the greatest military might in the world fail so badly in protecting their own people? Why did the US only spend a few months looking for Osama Bin Laden, the guy who was blamed for the attacks, and 3 years in Iraq which supposedly had nothing to do with it?

So, you see, I have plenty of questions and no real answers. I'm sure many feel the same way I do. In fact, I'm positive they do because I've found countless websites, blogs, news reports and interviews with people questioning these very things. In fact, I've seen an increase in the number of people asking these questions since the time I first saw "Loose Change". There is even one celebrity (Charlie Sheen) who is brave enough to go out in public and ask these very same questions.

I have no idea what happened that day, nobody does. I definitely don't believe what the government is trying to tell us but, I'm not quite certain I believe it was an Inside Job or not. I do know that there is a lot of secrecy involved and that causes me to not trust those who try and tell us what happened? So, I guess I forge ahead and try and quest my thirst for information.

If you have the same thirst, I suggest some of these websites:

And definatly these videos which really take a close look at the happenings of that day:

911: Road to Tyranny

CAll 911

CBC on 9/11

911 Eyewitness

The Great Conspiracy

Questioning the Pentagon Strike

Loose Change

In fact, just go to the freepressinternational site. It has plenty available. Or check this google video page out. There's plenty there too.

Watch the videos, read the articles, look at the footage and then, make up your own minds on what could and could not have happened that day. If you have further questions, demand answers. The truth has to be out there.

, , , , , , , , , ,


Conspiracy Smasher said...

All of your questions have been answered or debunked numerous times.

Stephen Eli Harris said...

Can you show me where these questions have been answered fully, instead of just saying they are? Believe me, I've looked.

The Artistic Macrophage said...

I will say that I agree there has been some coverup, but I believe it is to protect the Saudi's (The Bushes love them), and American interests in the Middle East. I also believed they used the attacks to provide ammunition to go in and get Saddam, but that is as far as I go.

As for the Outrageous claim that the U.S. Government made the whole thing up, or that they planned it themselves, I don't buy it. Too much information to the contrary, and a coverup/conspiracy that large would have been leaked out to the mainstream media (who are not government run despite some peoples claims).

Stephen Eli Harris said...

If you look into the situation futher, you soon realize that what you think is 'some coverup' because 'a lot of coverup'.

You say that there is a lot of information to back the 'official' story but, I say otherwise. There is more evidence out there now to complete disprove just about any aspect of what they say happened that day... let alone the evidence proving their guilt leading up to the day.

I don't think it's outragous to believe elements of the US government did this. After all, the first thing an investigator will think as he starts in on solving a crime is who had motive in the crime and who gained the most. The answer to both those would be the US government.

As for mainstream media, yes, they are controlled by elements of the US government. This to me is common knowledge.

The Artistic Macrophage said...

I haven't seen much "evidence" against the 911 attacks, just alot, yes a whole lot, of opinions, and speculation, and insinuation. Present these cold hard, well documented, proven facts you speak of...absence of evidence is not proof, don't forget.

Stephen Eli Harris said...

Have you visited my 9/11 blog? There's plenty of information there.

It's not about having proof to backup the 'conspiracy theory' (which there is tonnes of if you look) but, it's about the fact that there isn't enough evidence or answered questions to prove the 'official story'. The fact that they will not address this very important event further is enough for me to believe they were involved.

The Artistic Macrophage said...

So I am assuming, that as they likewise wont address roswell further, that you also believe little green men crashed and were taken there, and their ship too.

Maybe they feel they do not need to address it, because despite the "growing movement" you indicate is occuring, the VAST, VAST, majority of the world still believes the OFFICIAL Story.

The Artistic Macrophage said...


If you want the average "Jerry Springer" follower to believe you, than just tell them your "Truth" and they will likely take it on your word. if, however, you want to convince people like me, and other intellectuals, than you need to rpovide solid proof. That means experts sworn statements that something other than the "official story" took place, and if so the exacts (as sworn by them) as to what DID take place. Is it too much to ask to have REAL legitimate experts provide definite proof. Otherwise, why should I believe this so called "Real Truth".

Stephen Eli Harris said...

> despite the "growing movement" you
> indicate is occuring, the VAST,
> VAST, majority of the world still
> believes the OFFICIAL Story.

That doesn't make the official story true though.

Ricardo said...

Did you have a read at this from popular mechanics?

It sheds a lot of light on some very important questions your asking. Hope it helps.

Stephen Eli Harris said...

Thanks Ricardo. I've read that article but, I have a problem with it. People who were consulted on it are the very people we're asking questions about. Plus, there are plenty of scientists and such who say differently, enough to warrent another investigation.